Opinion: Why I don’t like the Porsche 911 Turbo

I might as well set fire to my own stake here, such is the popularity of the Porsche 911 Turbo. But, before you rush for your pitchforks, hear me out as it’s not all Turbos I dislike.

No, I dislike the water-cooled generation of 911 Turbos. They’re too clinical. Too precise. Ultimately, they are too good at what they do. It may sound bizarre to criticise a car for excelling but, it causes a huge problem for many car enthusiasts, myself included.

The latest 991 Turbo is a technological marvel. The rear-wheel steering system provides the car with an agility that a machine of such size just should not possess. What’s more, it does it without you, the driver, even noticing its existence.

Porsche 991 Turbo Lee
991 Turbo is incredibly accomplished, as Lee found out on his trip to Paris.

Since the 993, the 911 Turbo has enjoyed four-wheel drive and, in the 991, the system works seamlessly, providing traction in abundance. With 520bhp (560bhp in Turbo S spec) it’s necessary in applying all that firepower to the road.

Doing 138mph down the Wellington Straight at a sodden Silverstone National circuit left me in no doubt of the 991 Turbo’s inherent speed, and all the electronic aides kept me in a straight line without feeling like they interfered unnecessarily. But it didn’t really excite me.

Moving inside, the ergonomics of the Type-991 platform is excellent. The raised centre console provides easy access to the plethora of electronic controls, and the paddleshift-equipped Sport Design steering wheel is a delight to hold.

Porsche 991 Turbo S Silverstone
Putting a new Turbo S through its paces at Silverstone left a smile on Josh’s face. But he wouldn’t want to keep one.

But, for all the new 911 Turbo’s prowess, it lacks character. It’s a car designed to flatter average drivers with its flashy gizmos and gadgets. It’s incredibly easy to drive fast, and it’s incredibly easy to drive slow.

The turbo lag is non-existent thanks to the twin-turbochargers and variable turbine geometry, and the electric power steering helps to keep the car feeling manageable despite its 1,595kg base weight.

It’s the same situation with the original forced induction water-cooled 911, the 996 Turbo. As a engineering feat, it was way ahead of the competition but, as bland driving experiences go, the 996 Turbo is right up there in my books.

Porsche 911 Turbo Josh driving
Classic 911 Turbos provide a more engaging driving experience, according to Josh.

Compared to the original 930s, the modern Turbos just don’t thrill me. The characteristic flat-six sound is muted horrendously and, thanks to their prodigious grip, you have to be travelling at warp speed to get any sense of action.

By comparison, the Turbos of the Seventies and Eighties are incredibly flawed. The turbo lag can be counted in seconds, and their refinement doesn’t even come close to modern Zuffenhausen machinery.

Yet, the punch in the back as the 930’s torque kicks in is enough to make anyone smile. And, with its fearsome reputation, driving one fast or slow requires concentration and talent.

Porsche 930 LE Josh
The 930’s many idiosyncrasies are what makes the car so special. Do you agree?

While the air-cooled ‘six’ is quieter than its naturally aspirated cousins, the 930’s engine still retains an animalistic quality that the water-cooled powerplants lack. The aural drama is vital in providing the car’s character and, to me, its desirability.

This isn’t to say I wouldn’t accept a brand new 991 Turbo as a gift. I’d be stupid not to. But, given £120,000, I wouldn’t choose to spend my money on one. Such a large budget could buy me a host of cars with more character and long-term appeal.

I could get a classic 930 3.3-litre for my turbocharged kicks, and still afford a 997 GT3 Gen2 for larking about it, for example. Surely that’s not so bad?

Comments (5)

  • Rich Nicholls

    Have to agree. I delivered a 997 turbo for a photoshoot and covered many varied roads at a good lick. Could not believe the pace and poise it held. I was impressed but didn’t find it at all engaging and was unmoved by it as a driver’s car.

  • neillwatson

    Sorry, you’re wrong about the 996 Turbo. I’ll defend it to the death. It has just the right amount of turbo lag for a sense of occasion, great mid range power, a chassis that needs a bit of thought to get the best out of and not too much on the driver aid front, which can be switched off, should the urge take you.

    The seats are not the greatest, but the ride is a good compromise. Stay away from the Tiptronics, find one with the right set of suspension settings, learn to drive around the slight understeer and they’re a brilliant cross country car that still has enough involvement.

  • Ed Turner

    i’ve had a number of 911 turbo’s a 5 speed 930 a 964 turbo.
    I’ve had 3 996 Turbo’s. Best 911 Turbo bar none.

  • Ae Neuman

    agree with josh but… a good 997 turbo makes a fantastic long distance tourer, even with tiptronic ‘box. plus for daily use the water cooled cars have it all over the aircooled turbos.

  • Marie Bishops

    The author is a twat who has driven and. Not lived with these cars.
    He also cannot add up a nice 930 turbo and a gt2 i knocking on 160 grand these days.
    I run a 930 turbo its a heavy mans car not frighteningly quick but with frightening manners.
    Also running a 509 bhp 996 turbo manual it demands more focus and respect than the 930 the 996tt covers a lot of ground very very quickly and things can unravel just as fast.
    Don’t like tip but would love a late pdk as well